EDU
555
Rubric for Research/Presentation
a.
Class Handout
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
a) Complete Table of Contents b) Full bibliography in APA format |
a) Incomplete Table of Contents b) Incomplete bibliography in APA format or complete bibliography not in APA style |
a) No Table of Contents b) No bibliography |
b.
Balance of your own and photocopied work
10 points 8
points 5
point
|
Good balance of your own work and useful copied (photocopied) materials |
Heavy reliance on copied (photocopied) materials. Handout was ‘slim’ |
Total or almost total absence of your own work |
c.
Sources
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
a) 3 types of resources were used: books, journal articles, interviews, surveys, Internet, newspaper articles, case studies, personal videos etc. b) A total of at least 10 resources |
a) 2 types of resources b) total of 5-9 resources |
a) 1 type of resource b) less than 5 resources |
d.
Diverse Perspectives
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
Evidence that research has been done from differing viewpoints (historical, ethical, philosophical, sociological, statistical) and acknowledges the various criticisms in addition to several pros & cons on the topic presented |
Evidence that research has been done from adequate coverage of differing viewpoints and acknowledges some of the criticisms with a few pros & cons on the topic |
Evidence that research has been done through limited coverage of different viewpoints with little acknowledgement of criticisms and no treatment of pros and cons |
Presentation
a. Organization
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
a) The presentation is well organized with an introduction, followed by supporting evidence and closure b) The presentation is coherent and fully developed |
a) The presentation is not well developed. It lacks an introduction, well-developed evidence or closure. b) Coherence is attempted but not achieved |
a) Little of nothing is presented. The whole lacks organization and coherence and is poorly developed b) the presentation does not stay on topic |
b. Evidence of Collaboration
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
Evidence of collaboration. Equal participation in the
presentation |
Evidence of collaboration with less than equal participation in the presentation |
Little evidence of collaboration with extremely unequal participation in presentation |
c. Variety of Learning Styles
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
The presenters demonstrated the use of 3 or more modes of instruction: lecture, game, skit activity, discussion, group work, questioning, debate, guest lecturer etc. |
The presenters demonstrated the use of 2 modes of instruction |
The presenters relied almost entirely on lecture demonstrating the use of only 1 mode of instruction |
d.
Use of Visual Aids
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
Use of at least 2 types of visual aids: Powerpoint, video, slide projector, charts, OHP, document camera etc. |
Use of at least 1 type of visual aids |
No visual aids |
e. Engaged Interest of Class
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
High level of class engagement in the presentation |
Low levels of class involvement or presentation was too confusing |
Lecture only; presenters failed to engage the interest of the class. |
f. Personal Critical Analysis
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
The presenters successfully built their personal critical analysis of the subject material into the presentation |
Some attempt to build a personal critical analysis into the presentation |
Presenters failed to include a personal critical analysis of the subject matter |
g. Quoting from the Research Literature
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
4 or more quotes from the research literature |
2 quotes from the research literature |
Presenters failed to provide quotes from the research literature |
h. Management of Time
10 points 8 points 5 points
|
The presenters used their time wisely covering the material content of their presentation, the scheduled activities, closure and time for questions within the time allowed. |
The presenters got part way through their presentation but ran out of time and did not allow for adequate closure or questions. |
The presentation essentially fell apart. The presenters did not follow a logical sequence and lost focus |