Web Applications for Communication, Community Outreach, and Student Recruitment and Retention in Teacher Education: An Ongoing Evaluation
Paper
present at the WebNet 2001 World Conference
Orlando, Florida, October 24-27, 2001
Friday, October 26, 2001, 2:45 P.M.
Holiday Inn
also found at http://www.csudh.edu/soe/faculty/NMach/WebNet2001.html
and at http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/stoloff/webnet2001.htm
|
David L. Stoloff, Ph.D., |
Nada Mach, Ph.D. |
Abstract
Over the last five years, the authors have examined how teacher educators in
university programs (SCDEs - schools, colleges, and/or departments of education
in colleges and universities) have made use of the World Wide Web to
communicate with other potential and current educators (defined as
cybercasting). An evaluation matrix was developed to demonstrate which programs
are exemplary, have models of effective Web use, and which may be followed as
best practices. The authors have expanded their examination from 50 to 70
Websites of SCDEs, and have expanded the foci of their matrices to reflect
changing uses. The current study reviews changes in the uses of the WWW by
teacher educators since 1996, and projected directions for the future.
Introduction
The authors, faculty members in teacher education programs in California and
Connecticut, have been reviewing the use of the World Wide Web (WWW) by teacher
education programs since 1996. They have chosen the term cybercasting to
represent how teacher educators use the WWW to reach specific audiences of
educators, as well as to make information about their programs and activities
accessible to all who seek the knowledge. The number of sites reviewed and the
nature of the reviews have expanded in the last five years ? going from a
review of the functions of Websites for teacher educators, to an evaluation of
Web presences of teacher education programs, to a discussion of how these Web
presences foster educational leadership, and to a showcase of programs which
make use of their Websites to share responsibility for recruiting and retaining
caring and competent teachers. The authors have also expanded the focus of the
discussion to how teacher educators use communication on the WWW for sharing
leadership and for expanding online opportunities and access for all learners.
The 1996 Teacher Education Cybercasting
Review
During the second half of 1996, Stoloff (1997) examined applications of the WWW
that might prove useful for the expanding roles of leadership in teacher education
and higher education reform. These emerging applications were seen as tools for
expanding student recruitment, admission and retention, curriculum development
and implementation, multi-media linkages, learning communities, Academy
discussions, school-university partnerships, community outreach, research, and
assessment, and professional placement.
Some findings included that of the one hundred teacher education Websites that
were initially selected in June 1996, 24 had moved to other sites by February
1997. Several sites that once offered music or public documents were closed to
free access by Web wanderers. Other sites had been upgraded and moved to their
own servers - particularly those of the professional societies. The use of
video for transmitting information on the WWW seemed to be limited, while
examples of the use of small audio segments were evident. During the
latter part of 1996, there seemed to have been increased interest in placing
course materials and distance learning courses on the WWW.
The 1998 Review of Cybercasting for
Teacher Education
Stoloff and Mach (1999) expanded on the previous review by developing a grid
for evaluating teacher education Websites. Fifty-one teacher education
programs’ Websites were reviewed for the following indicators:
The authors found that none of the teacher education Websites had a perfect score in 1998. One feature that was frequently missing from the SCDE homepage was the address and phone number, although it was often clearly present on the university's homepage, or easily accessible through a link. Most SCDE Websites did not have a formative program evaluation posted, but there were many that did have email addresses for any type of informal feedback. Clarity of navigation was essential. Those Websites that went beyond the knowledge level for all of their programs, as well as most of their faculty and courses were truly impressive. Taking advantage of all that electronic communication has to offer, they presented a clear inviting picture of the pursuit of a career in education.
The 1999 Review of Cybercasting for
Teacher Education
Stoloff and Mach (2000) reviewed how teacher education programs discuss their
PK-12 school-university collaborations on the World Wide Web. Over 50 teacher
education Websites were reviewed for the presence of:
The reviewers were able to find examples of all of these kinds of Websites among the teacher education programs, with some of the more advanced Websites and programs offering all of the elements within their cybercasting.
The 2000 Reviews of Cybercasting for
Teacher Education and 2001’s New Directions
Mach and Stoloff (2001) found changes in cybercasting in the last two years.
Teacher education Websites in general have become more navigable and more
attractive. Faculty homepages are far more common, although not necessarily as
informative as one might prefer. Online courses now proliferate, whereas in
1999 they did not. When syllabi were found in 1999, they were open to review by
the casual observer. Now more and more frequently, the pages are created within
a closed system for which a password is necessary, as in Blackboard or WebCT.
Stoloff and Mach (2001) examined online resources which expand the roles of educators, including models of virtual high schools, school-university partnerships and their online courses for future teachers, general education courses for undergraduates, online teacher education courses and resources for upper division or graduate students, inservice coursework, graduate teacher education programs online, and professional development learning communities for educators. This study documented the potential of online resources to augment, supplement, and supplant the formal structures of schooling.
As we explore Web use by SCDEs in the future, we anticipate a trend toward utilizing the exemplary features. We look forward to increased sharing of experiences in the applications of the WWW in teacher education and in higher education in general, as well as increased collaboration across institutions, including the possibility of developing an international consortium of online educators.
Webliography in Reverse Chronological Order
Criteria for Evaluating Websites of SCDEs
In their efforts at community outreach, communication, as well as recruitment and and retetention of teachers, SCDEs have used a variety of means that are evident on their Web sites. A few of the techniques used in recruitment and retention include:
|
SCDE |
WWW Address |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
- |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
x |
- |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
http://www.tc.columbia.edu/Teachers College |
- |
x |
x |
x |
- |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
- |
x |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
- |
x |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
- |
x |
||
|
x |
- |
x |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
- |
- |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
x |
x |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
- |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
http://www.sru.edu/depts/educatio/coll.htm |
x |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
- |
- |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
x |
- |
x |
- |
x |
||
|
x |
- |
x |
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
- |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
- |
x |
x |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
- |
- |
x |
x |
||
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
x |
||
|
x |
x |
- |