Title of Session
Type of Session: Roundtable Discussion
Abstract
Roundtable discussion on exemplary Information and Communication Technology
applications by SCDEs and other educational agencies designed to expand
opportunities for shared policy-making, leadership, professional and resource
development, and problem-solving.
| David L. Stoloff, Ph.D.,
Professor and Department Chair, Education Department Eastern Connecticut State University 83 Windham Street, Webb Hall Room 129 Willimantic, CT 06226 tel. no. (860) 465 - 5501 fax. no. (860) 465 - 4538 email: stoloffd@easternct.edu |
Nada Mach, Ph.D.,
Coordinator, Secondary Alternative Credential Program California State University, Dominguez Hills Teacher Education Department 1000 East Victoria Street Carson, CA 90747 tel. no. (310) 243-3915 email: nmach@DHVX20.CSUDH.EDU |
Section I: Content
A. Statement of the Problem
How will technology and distance learning change the nature of shared
leadership in teacher education?" What are the implications on online
teacher education coursework and programs on curriculum development and
implementation? How have educators collaborated to develop and share
curricular items, assessment information, and cooperative projects across
districts? What are the benefits and the concerns raised by the uses
of Information and Communication Technology in teacher education?
B. Literature Review
Britain's Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) in early 1998
expanded on the research on Information Technology (IT) by publishing a
set of criteria for infusing Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
in Initial Teacher Training. Cox (1999) notes that IT is a required
subject in the National Curriculum in Britain, while ICT is the application
of IT across the curriculum.
As reported by Pachler (1999), the DfEE stated that "ICT is more than
a teaching tool. Its potential for improving the quality and standards
of pupils' education is significant. Equally, its potential is considerable
for supporting teachers, both in their everyday classroom role, for example
for reducing the time occupied by the administration associated with it,
and in their continuing training and development."
There are numerous models of attempts to empower educators to share
the responsibilities of educational policy-making, curriculum development,
teacher training, and leadership throughout Europe. Preston (1999)
outlines the UK's government's commitment to the establishment of the National
Grid for Learning, the development of the internet for professional communications.
Davis (1999) describes an Internet-based research center that is located
within the United Kingdom's Virtual Teacher Center. Smith (1999)
catalogs opportunities for the applications of ICT in primary grades.
Williams (1999) suggests way to enhancing future design and delivery of
self- and staff-development. Tearle (1999) outlines the European Commission's
goals for its T3 (Telematics for Teacher Training) projects which "is to
work with teacher trainers across Europe to support them using ICT in order
to enhance their own professional development and the learning of their
student teachers."
In North America, there are also examples of ICT applications for educational
leadership. The Alliance for Community Technology, http://www.communitytechnology.org/index.html
, a strategic, online partnership between the University of Michigan and
W.K. Kellogg Foundation, has as its mission "to help people help themselves
through the practical application of knowledge and resources to improve
their quality of life and that of future generations" (ACT, 2000).
The Connecticut NASA Education Collaborative, http://g3.tmsc.org/cnec/index2.htm
, is a collective partnership among leading state educational institutions,
informal education science centers, mathematics, science & technology
teacher organizations, and the Connecticut state department of education
designed to share resources and develop curriculum and policy to improve
science, mathematics and technology K-16 education (CNEC, 2000).
Teachers.net (2000), http://www.teachers.net/
, provide tools and resources for national collaborations in chat rooms
and virtual meetings and for lesson planning, curriculum development, and
professional development information. Apple Learning Interchange
(2000), http://ali.apple.com/ , is
an online learning resource for teaching, learning, research and collaboration.
The Center for Collaborative Research in Education at the University of
California, Irvine, hosts the California Learning Interchange at http://www.gse.uci.edu/cli/
which links educators, researchers and community members with
the goal of creating deep understanding of educational problems in the
school context and to encourage evidence-based reasoning to solve these
problems.
Stoloff (2000) outlines three university-funded projects over three years that built at first on curriculum development - the creation of electronic textbooks, annotated bookmark lists of resources on a specific topic. The project in its second year evolved into the development and assessment of online curricular units and a discussion of needed school reform to allow for these changes in curriculum delivery. In its third year, a virtual community of educators was developed for sharing curriculum, joint research projects, and grant proposals on a statewide basis.
C. Contributions
This roundtable will serve to continue an ongoing discussion on the
use of the technology and distance learning for enhancing teacher education,
collaborative educational projects not limited in space and time, and for
sharing responsibility for educational policy development and leadership.
Information gathered from the other participants at the roundtable and
during ongoing research on the topic of ICT applications for empowerment
will be developed into a webpage. Participants at the roundtable
will also be invited to form a list-serv, a mail group, on the topic of
using ICT in teacher education and educational policy-making.
D. Conclusions
This study will result in an overview of exemplary uses of the World
Wide Web for expanding the shared responsibilities of all educators to
define policy and develop consensual leadership. This study will
also be submitted to ERIC, developed into a readily available website,
and be expanded for submission to the Journal of Teacher Education and
educational technology journals.
Section II: Outcomes and Methods
A. Learner/Participant Outcomes
During this roundtable, participants will compare exemplary practices
in the use of Information and Communication Technology for empowering educators
for decision-making, problem-solving within a professional development
group, and sharing of best practices. Participants will share their
own experiences with the development and applications of Web-based information
and suggest additional exemplary websites and practices in this area.
Other topics for discussion will include potential trends in the use of
the WWW by SCDEs and other educational organizations and ways that technology-using
teacher educators might more effectively network on this and other topics.
Methods
Paper copies of this study’s Web page, with links to exemplary projects
that have served as a setting for educators to share responsibilities for
educational policy development and decision-making, for expanding consensual
leadership in teacher education, and for curriculum and resource development,
will be shared. Participants will be asked to describe their experiences
in developing and using Web-based information, with a particular focus
on how networking has empowered them in policy development and leadership.
Names and e-mail addresses will be collected to initiate increased networking
among colleagues interested in the potential of the Information and Communication
Technology for sharing the responsibility for educational leadership and
policy development.