|
Research
and Creativity Activities
Questions about newsletter? Please contact David Stoloff, email: stoloffd@easternct.edu |
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT NEWS Sixth Week of Classes Fall 2002 Edition
- best viewed at http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/news/021007.html |
|
Please see the University
Disclaimer. |
*****
Words of Inspiration
the
collection appears at http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/news/words.html
From the
Milken Family Foundation http://www.mff.org/newsroom/news.taf?page=325
April 10, 2002
New
Report Compares Teaching in U.S. with Eight Developed Countries
U.S.
priorities regarding teachers differ from other nations’. Respect for the
education profession has declined here and abroad.
The
professional in-service training, requirements and responsibilities of American
K-12 teachers outweigh those of teachers in many developed nations, according
to Teachers’
Professional Lives – A View from Nine Industrialized Countries, a new
report compiled by the Schools Around the World (SAW) program of the Council
for Basic Education and funded by the Milken Family Foundation.
Study
findings were released today at the SAW symposium, International Perspectives
on Teacher Quality in an Age of Accountability.
The
professional climate and circumstances of teachers in Australia, the Czech
Republic, France, Germany, Hong Kong SAR, Japan, Portugal and the United
Kingdom were compared to those in the U.S. in an effort to uncover policies and
practices that support teacher success and student achievement.
Pre-service
teacher training and qualifications are emphasized in the eight foreign
countries, while professional development is deemed less important. Typical
pre-employment requirements abroad include rigorous academic and pedagogical
study and certification processes, supported by strong practice teaching and
induction programs.
By
contrast, pre-service training and certification requirements of U.S. teachers
are rarely rigorous, although professional development activities are mandatory
throughout their careers.
Each
of the eight international countries has a national or state curriculum that
dictates what must be covered in each class and guides teaching. Only in the U.S.
must teachers develop their own curriculum aligned with state standards and
assessments.
Secondary-level
teachers in the U.S. report a workload at least 30% larger than all foreign
counterparts except those in Germany.
Teaching
is considered a life-long career choice in most surveyed countries. Attrition rates
in all but the United Kingdom are low. Like the U.S., 40% of U.K. teachers
leave the profession within the first three years.
Many
nations face overwhelming numbers of retirements as the teacher population
ages; however due to slowing population growth, all but Australia project
adequate numbers of replacement teachers.
In
countries where teaching is prestigious, educator salaries are competitive and
student achievement is high.
In most surveyed countries, teacher
salaries are lower than other professions, and decline over time in comparison
to other occupations. In those nations, teaching has seen a corresponding
decline in status and appeal.
Overseas, teachers are rarely held
accountable for student achievement. Although most school systems conduct
regular teacher assessments, these evaluations do not cover student
achievement.
Results are primarily used as an advisory
tool for promotion and professional development. The single exception is in the
U.K., where performance-related pay for senior-level educators was recently
introduced.
Holding teachers and schools accountable
for student learning is an emerging trend in the United States. Some states are
using gains in student achievement to gauge teacher effectiveness and determine
salary bonuses.
The Council for Basic Education (CBE)
advocates high academic standards for all students and exemplary teaching in
our nation’s public schools.
Its Schools Around the World (SAW) program
is an international partnership to further understanding of what constitutes
higher levels of student achievement in science and mathematics.
Posted on
October 4, 2002
****
The new Title II, Part A of ESEA creates
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants to strengthen teacher quality and
increase the number of highly qualified teachers and principals. In
Connecticut, the higher education component of this initiative is known as the Teacher
Quality Partnership Grant Program. It replaces the Eisenhower Professional
Development Grant Program and the Connecticut Collaborations for Teaching the
Arts and Humanities.
For 2003, the Connecticut Department of
Higher Education is authorized to award $663,199 in competitive Teacher Quality
Partnership Grants for professional development projects for teachers,
paraprofessionals and principals across 10 core academic subjects (English,
reading or language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and
government, economics, the arts, history and geography). Preference will
be given to proposals which address at least one of several priorities, among
them projects that seek to:
·
increase teacher mastery of
subject matter, especially in mathematics, science and the essential themes
which define the American experience
·
recruit and prepare minority
teachers, and
·
improve
the leadership skills of principals.
Applicants must be partnerships consisting
of at least:
1) the division of a Connecticut public or
independent institution of higher education that prepares teachers and
principals,
2) one or more schools or departments of arts
and sciences at that institution, and
3) one or more high-need schools or school
districts in Connecticut.
Other schools, colleges, education groups
and non-profit organizations may serve as additional partners. Please note that
no single participant in an eligible partnership may use more than 50 percent
of the partnership grant award.
Project periods may vary over a period of
17 months. Multi-year activities are allowed based on available funds and
progress in meeting goals. Requested project amounts depend on the scope of the
activities proposed; there are no minimum or maximum award limits. Proposals
are due January 10, 2003 and grant awards will be announced February 7, 2003.
For more
information about this grant program, please see
usually on Thursdays, 12:30 - 1:45 in Webb Hall 115.
Committee on
Admissions and Retention in Education meeting – October 10, 2002
Please submit
agenda items to Mitch Sakofs – sakofsm@easternct.edu
.
*****
Photos
from the Diversity Seminar – September 4, 2002 - http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/news/photosf02/photosfall2002.html
*****
*****
A message from Hope Cook, Curriculum Center Librarian -
“Hi David and Education Faculty,
Just wanted to let you know that the
Curriculum Center Computer Lab, Room 145 of the Eugene Smith Library is now
open for your use!
Here are some of the
highlights added to the Computer Lab:
·6 new PC's with Internet Access and equipped with
educational and presentational software titles
·1 of the 6 PC's is setup as an instructor station. This
station includes a projector that will allow the instructor the
opportunity to project information to a screen, or if one prefers to the white
board.
·We have also retained 1 Macintosh machine that is loaded
with software and has Internet access.
·The computer lab also includes a VCR, Slide Projector, and
Overhead Projector
·Additionally, students can use this room to work on
classroom projects as we now have 2 Ellison Machines and several dies to cut
letters, borders, etc.The lab is also equipped with a sink.
·The lab can seat up to 20 people and would be ideal for
those teaching courses that contain some component of children's literature or
the use of educational software.
Thank you!
Hope”
Dr. Jeanelle Bland has
been appointed Curriculum Center Computer Lab liaison from the Education
Department.
****
News from state sources and NCATE via Dean
Kleine –
http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/newsMedia/e-Connection.asp%23gr
Jim McKenna,
Director of the CT Alternative Route to Certification program, sends this link
to an article that he found encouraging:
A report by the
National Association of State Boards of Education concludes
that ALTERNATIVE
TEACHER CERTIFICATION programs can be effective tools for
addressing both
teacher shortages and teacher quality concerns. The report
recommends that
state policymakers ensure standards for alternative programs
are linked to
academic standards for students.
http://www.nasbe.org/Front_Page/Press_Release2.html
****
NCATE news –
Here is a very
useful collection of material responding to the demands for
"highly
qualified teachers" coming from the White House, while the Secretary
of Education
continues to bombard us with demands to let highly qualified
non-teachers
into the classrooms! These notes
and articles are from Jane
Leibbrand, Vice
President for Communications, NCATE.
**************************************************
Dear Colleagues:
I know you are in the
midst of a busy fall. Here are some items which
could be of help
as you speak as an advocate for rigorous teacher
preparation
requirements which help ensure highly qualified teachers.
Quality Teaching
I'm enclosing
the fall issue of Quality Teaching, NCATE's newsletter. As
part of a
cost-savings plan, it's now online:
http://www.ncate.org/pubs/qt_f02.pdf
. I hope you will enjoy reading
it.
Contents include
the following:
Art discusses the increasing
focus on teacher retention;
a new report provides an overview
of teacher training requirements in
eight other industrialized
countries--all require preparation in both
content and pedagogy--policy that
stands in contrast to the
recommendations in the U.S.
Department report on Title II,
"Meeting the
Highly Qualified Teachers
Challenge";
an educator responds to the U.S.
Department of Education report,
"Meeting the Highly Qualfied
Teachers Challenge," and
Donna Gollnick, Carol Vukelich,
and Kathy Lake discuss performance
assessment practice.
News Clips
Next, I'd like to
share some recent news clips with you. They are
representative
of the media's focus on education this fall. The first clip
is especially
disturbing. It shows that the No Child Left Behind Act
creates the
paradoxical possiblity that its requirement for 'highly
qualified'
teachers may actually lower standards for teachers. As
appropriate,
please share your analysis of recent reports and news with
policymakers,
along with a personal note from you. It's important to stay
in touch with
your state and federal representatives to let them hear your
voice on the
importance of strong state teacher preparation and licensing
requirements for
teachers.
August-September
Press Round Up
http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/3884224p-4909966c.html
"CA's
40,000 new 'highly qualified' teachers" Sacramento Bee 8/7
This article is
priceless. The editorial exposes how inexperienced teachers
are being hired
in California as a means to satisfy the terms of the No
Child Left
Behind Act, and thus continue to receive federal funds. Under
the new
definition, quietly adopted by the State Board of Education in May,
a teacher can be
listed as 'highly qualified' even though he or she has yet
to earn a
California teaching credential.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/22/education/22TEAC.html
1 in 4 Teachers Is Not Trained in Field
NY Times 8/22
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20020903/4412401s.htm
Standardize
teachers before standardizing tests
USA Today 9/3
Editorial on the
need for qualified teachers; highlights Ed Trust finding
that funding gap
persists in low-income schools
from the August
26, 2002 edition of the Christian Science Monitor -
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0826/p01s01-usgn.htm
As standards
rise, too few teachers
As American
schools reopen, a 15-year effort to "professionalize" the job
of teacher is
running up against a strong counterforce ? the urgent need to
fill classroom
vacancies.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4380-2002Aug27.html
More Md. Teachers Not Fully
Certified Washington Post 8/27
Teachers without
full certification were hired in increasing numbers by
Maryland's 24
public school districts this year ? a trend running counter
to a new federal
law.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59173-2002Sep9.html
Top Teachers
Rare in Poor Schools Washington Post 9/10
Highly Qualified
Instructors Quickly Move On, Hurting Education of
Low-Income
Children. studies find several new studies note that the poorest
children are
hurt by having the least experienced, and often the least
effective,
instructors.
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20020827/4393996s.htm
"Principals too quick to use
'teacher shortage' as excuse" USA Today 8/27
One-fourth of
the teachers lack full credentials. The shortages are common
in big urban
districts, where school leaders say they're often forced to
lower their
standards when filling teaching jobs. USA Today mistakenly
blames
administrators for placing teachers out of field.
NASSP responds:
Principals' Hands Are Tied
"It defies logic to propose that
principals do not want fully credentialed teachers in every classroom,
especially in a climate of rigorous academic standards and high-stakes
testing."
Gerry Tirozzi
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2002-08-26-oppose_x.htm
Education
secretary: Non-teachers could alleviate teacher shortage
Education
Secretary Rod Paige yesterday said the teacher shortage could be
resolved by
letting 'qualified non-teachers' into classrooms. Reg Weaver
takes exception
and says he wants well prepared teachers for all students.
USA Today (9/17)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2002-09-16-education_x.htm
Minority teacher
training stressed
Challenge made
to black colleges
Rod Paige
yesterday urged black college and university leaders to prepare
education
students more thoroughly for teaching disadvantaged children.
Journal and
Constitution (Atlanta) (9/17)
http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/epaper/editions/today/news_d3686c0db126e17d00bc.html
I thought you'd
enjoy seeing the last two clips together; both appeared on
the same day.
Use the NCATE
Speakers Guide,
http://www.ncate.org/2000/speaker%27s%20guide%20nov2000.pdf to provide
assistance as
you formulate editorials. The Guide contains NCATE's
messages, tips
on writing editorials, and sample articles. Send us
published
articles so that we can share them.
Jane Leibbrand
Vice President for Communications
NCATE
2010 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Suite
500
Washington, D.C. 20036
tel. 202/466-7496
fax: 202/296-6620
e-mail: jane@ncate.org
website: http://www.ncate.org
****
An interesting resource shared by Dean
Kleine –
Schools are under
increasing pressure to use practices based on scientific evidence (e.g.,
evidence-based programs). Our colleagues at the Collaborative for Academic,
Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) have developed a helpful guide for
evaluating curricula that foster and promote social and emotional learning. Safe
and Sound: An Educational Leader's Guide to Evidence-Based Social and Emotional
Learning Programs will be published sometime in late October but you can
review and download a pre-publication copy at their website: www.casel.org. An accompanying CD will provide
comprehensive descriptions and ordering information for all of the programs
reviewed. This will be an invaluable guide for school districts.
****
back to top
Announcement
from Neil Williams, HPE Dept Chair
Please alert Ed Dept faculty and
students:
HPE 210 (3 credits) does NOT
satisfy the GER V.B. physical education requirement in any manner; nor does HPE
201(1 credit).
Thanks for your assistance in this
matter. Several EDU students have called about this in just the first two
days of the term.
Neil
****
****
A message from
Professor Ross E. Koning, PhD
Chapter President ECSU-AAUP
Biology Department - Goddard Hall
email: Koning@EasternCT.edu
http://Koning.EasternCT.edu/
Greetings ECSU-AAUP Faculty,
I am pleased to announce that our
on-line (html) version
of the 2002-2006 CSU AAUP-BOT Collective Bargaining
Agreement is on-line at the usual URL:
http://www.easternct.edu/aaup/cba.html
This version is, of course,
unofficial...but we have worked
hard to make it identical with the printed version in content,
and have hopefully corrected most of the printed version's
flaws.
We encourage you to try it
out. All internal and some external
references are linked so navigation is better than in the print
version. You can also use the find and find-again feature of
your browser to search for words in the contract...so finding
items is perhaps easier. On the down-side, the contract is now
in a single file that is sometimes slow to open if you are on a
modem connection...but we think your patience will be rewarded.
I also encourage you to
right-click (PC USERS) or click-hold-drag
(Mac USERS) on the CBA link on the home page to DOWNLOAD
the contract to your hard-drive for improved loading times. Our
home-page is:
Best wishes for the fall semester.
ross
Professor Ross E. Koning, PhD
Chapter President ECSU-AAUP
Biology Department - Goddard Hall
****
message from
Bernetta Steadman, Assistant Director, Admissions, ECSU:
I came across this website (http://www.nasbe.org/) and thought you might
be interested in the Minority Teacher Recruitment Conference/Exhibition.
It would be a good opportunity to
attract qualified minority individuals to our grad and certification
programs. Let me know what you think. Perhaps this is something you could
coordinate in conjunction with the Admissions Office if you feel it is a
worthwhile endeavor
I would suggest reading about the
exhibitor info.
****
Call for Graduating Senior Information
A request from Institutional
Research -
Please share news about the plans
of graduating seniors.
If they are going on to graduate
school, please provide the graduate's name, undergraduate major,
graduate university, location (city, state), field of study and degree program
sought, and any information
on scholarships and/or fellowships.
If they have been accepted for
employment positions, please provide the graduate's name,
undergraduate major, company, location (city, state), position, salary.
Please email the information to
David, who will compile it for the department. Thanks.
*****
Other Events
back to top
****
ECSU - ThinkQuest for Tomorrow's Teachers Projects
Faculty members and students from
Eastern Connecticut State University are participating in a US Department of
Education grant to Prepare Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology with
ThinkQuest
[ http://www.thinkquest.org] and 13
other universities throughout the US. This project's homepage may be at http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/dept/pt3.html
.
back to top
****
Long Term Announcements
Alumni news may be found at http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/news/alumninews.html.
Planning
back to top
Past surveys of our graduates are
available on the WWW -
an analysis of the survey of teacher
education program graduates 1996-98
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/assessment/survey9698.htm
results of the survey of teacher
education program graduates - 1996-1998 -
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/assessment/surveyresults9698.htm,
and
results of the survey of teacher
education program graduates - 1998-2000 -
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/assessment/gradsurvey2001.htm
survey of interests in graduate
programs -1999,
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/assessment/gradinterestsurvey1999.htm
survey of interests in graduate
programs - 2001
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/assessment/gradinterestsurvey2001.htm
Planning forms for field
experiences and student teaching for Spring 2003 are now posted at
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/dept/stinfo.doc
*****
Research and Creativity Activities -
chronicling the ongoing progress of the Education Department at
Eastern Connecticut State University
also found at http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/news/rca.html
Fifth Report
July 11, 2002
Our Graduates Speak
An analysis of survey data provided by ECSU program completers
concerning their professional preparation and Connecticut’s
Common Core of Teaching
An
Eastern Connecticut State University
Research Brief
Prepared by
Mitchell Sakofs
Director of Educational Experience
Spring 2002
Introduction
As part of an ongoing effort to
improve program quality in the Eastern Connecticut State University
Education Unit, a survey was sent to ECSU graduates who were recommended for
teaching certification
from 1999 through 2001. This survey was designed to explore two main
issues, i.e.,
· their assessment of the BEST
program and
· their assessment of the professional preparation they received at Eastern in
terms of Connecticut’s
Common Core of Teaching.
Questions concerning BEST were
modeled after a state survey designed to probe how certified teachers
assess the professional preparation they received through institutions of
higher learning; questions
concerning Connecticut’s Common Core of Teaching were taken from the Common
Core documentation
found on the Connecticut State Education Department’s website. Questions
probing our graduates’
assessment of BEST as well as the professional preparation provided by the ECSU
Education Unit were
structured to allow for responses on a 5-point Likert Scale with 5 = Strongly
Agree, 4 = Agree, 3 =
Undecided, 2 = Disagree, and 1 = Strongly Disagree. See Exhibit 1, page
4.
This report presents student
assessment data of the professional preparation provided by ECSU’s
Education Unit. An analysis of BEST data will be reported in another
document.
Procedure
Three hundred and forty surveys
were mailed to students who were recommended for teaching
certification from 1999 through 2001.
Data were analyzed using
SPSS. Data transformations from interval to categorical data were
performed so percentages in the following categories for each question could be
calculated: Negative,
Undecided and Positive. The procedure to create these
categories was as follows: if a respondent
indicated a negative response to a question, e.g., in response to a question
they scored a 1 or 2, the
variable was recoded into a Negative category. Likewise if they scored a
question 4 or 5, the variable
was recoded into a Positive category. A response of 3 was recoded as
Undecided.
Results
· 340 surveys mailed, 20 were
returned as undeliverable and 95 were returned with completed surveys.
This is a 30% response rate.
· Percent of respondents within each program were as follows: 45% Early
Childhood, 17% Elementary,
8% Middle, 12% Secondary and 18% HPE.
· Percent of respondents within each degree category offered were as follows:
76% Undergraduate, 10%
Post-baccalaureate and 14% Graduate.
· Mean scores on the 18 aspects of Connecticut’s Common Core of Teaching ranged
from a low of 3.5 to a
high of 4.2. See Exhibit 2, page 10.
· Percentages for the recoded data concerning Connecticut’s Common Core of
Teaching in the POSITIVE
category ranged from a high of 91.5% to a low of 59%. See Exhibit 3, page
17.
o The areas scoring 90% or above positive were:
§ Q21B, how students learn and develop
§ Q34B, share responsibility for student achievement
§ Q38B, demonstrate a commitment to students
o The areas scoring 80% to 89% positive were:
§ Q22B, Understand how students differ
§ Q26B, Recognize need to vary instructional methods
§ Q27B, Select learning tasks to make subject meaningful
§ Q29B, Instructional opportunities support academic, social and personal
development
§ Q30B, Use of verbal and non verbal media/foster individual and collaborative
inquiry
§ Q33B, Conduct as a professional
§ Q35B, Continually engaged in self-evaluation
o The areas scoring 70% to 79%
positive were:
§ Q24B, Understand the central concepts of the discipline I teach
§ Q25B, Know how to design and deliver instruction
§ Q28B, Establish and maintain appropriate standards of behavior
§ Q31B, Employ a variety of instructional strategies
§ Q32B, Use of various assessment techniques
§ Q36B, Seek out opportunities to grow professionally
§ Q37B, Serve as a leader in the school
o The areas scoring below 70%
positive were:
§ Q23B, Proficient in reading, writing and mathematics
Conclusions and Recommendations
This research reveals how
graduates of the ECSU teacher certification programs view the efficacy of
their professional preparation within the context of Connecticut’s Common Core
of Teaching.
For these findings to meaningfully
guide programmatic changes, it is recommended that:
1. faculty review their course
syllabi to better understand how the dimensions of the Common Core are
expressed in course content, and
2. review the data provided here to determine which elements of the Common Core
need to be more
substantively addressed in courses. While it may seem reasonable to look
to strengthen aspects of the
program that students found wanting, it may be that faculty chose to strengthen
areas of strength, as
they are deemed central and appropriate for pre-service teacher preparation.
This document may also be
downloaded from
http://www.easternct.edu/depts/edu/news/graduatesspeak02.doc
as a WORD document.
Searches
back to top
searches pending approval -
we had request an additional faculty member in Elementary Education.
Teacher Quality Partnership Grant Program
The new Title II, Part A of ESEA creates
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants to strengthen teacher quality and
increase the number of highly qualified teachers and principals. In
Connecticut, the higher education component of this initiative is known as the Teacher
Quality Partnership Grant Program. It replaces the Eisenhower Professional
Development Grant Program and the Connecticut Collaborations for Teaching the
Arts and Humanities.
For 2003, the Connecticut Department of
Higher Education is authorized to award $663,199 in competitive Teacher Quality
Partnership Grants for professional development projects for teachers,
paraprofessionals and principals across 10 core academic subjects (English,
reading or language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and
government, economics, the arts, history and geography). Preference will
be given to proposals which address at least one of several priorities, among
them projects that seek to:
·
increase teacher mastery of
subject matter, especially in mathematics, science and the essential themes
which define the American experience
·
recruit and prepare minority
teachers, and
·
improve
the leadership skills of principals.
Applicants must be partnerships consisting
of at least:
1) the division of a Connecticut public or
independent institution of higher education that prepares teachers and
principals,
2) one or more schools or departments of arts
and sciences at that institution, and
3) one or more high-need schools or school
districts in Connecticut.
Other schools, colleges, education groups
and non-profit organizations may serve as additional partners. Please note that
no single participant in an eligible partnership may use more than 50 percent
of the partnership grant award.
Project periods may vary over a period of
17 months. Multi-year activities are allowed based on available funds and
progress in meeting goals. Requested project amounts depend on the scope of the
activities proposed; there are no minimum or maximum award limits. Proposals
are due January 10, 2003 and grant awards will be announced February 7, 2003.
For more
information about this grant program, please see
The Summer
Institute for Future Teachers grant and the Institute for Future Teachers Using
Technology grants have been refunded. David Stoloff is seeking student
assistants who would contact local school principals and teachers to plan and
implement the formation of more Future Teachers Clubs/Young Educators Societies
in our region. Please contact David Stoloff - email: stoloffd@easternct.edu, 860- 465- 5501
for further details.
Jamie Hendricks shared this link
to the Mansfield Schools employment website -
http://www.mansfieldct.org/MBOE/Employ/docs/Web%20Posting%206.02B.doc
*****
Recently acquired media - in the Chair's Office or on the Web
back to top
Teaching Our Youngest: A
Guide for Preschool Teachers and Child-Care and Family Providers. (2002)
Early Childhood-Head Start Task Force, US Dept. of Education and US Dept. of
Health and Human Services.
America's Children: Key
National Indicators of Well-Being 2002. Federal Interagency Forum on
Child and Family Statistics.
Notes from the 2002 Creative
Advance - "Creativity Through Diversity" - Thursday, August 22, 2002,
Eastern Connecticut State University.
Evaluator's Report on the May
State On-Site Review of ECSU's Teacher Education Programs. Received May
31, 2002.
Institutional Overview and
Response to Standards, Self-examination report on Teacher Preparation
Programs at ECSU, March 2002.
Portfolio Responses for BEST
program, 2001-2002.
Precondition Report for the
Education Unit - April 2002, NCATE document
Handbooks for the Development of
Teaching Portfolios 2001-2002 - Connecticut State Department of
Education - most subjects
General Education Committee's
General Education Program Proposal
Wednesdays - A Compilation of
Short Stories written by Eastern Connecticut State University
Graduate Students
Educational Technology Resource
Documents from the Connecticut State Department of Education.
American Association of State
Colleges and Universities (AASCU) Public Policy Agenda - 2002.
The BEST Program Portfolio
Resources 2001-2002: School Year
BEST 2001-2002 Rubrics.
Faculty Handbook.
Our Reading/Language Arts room,
Webb Hall 113, has been enriched with past issues of Phi Delta Kappan, Academe,
Syllabus, Converge, Governmental Technology, Journal of Teacher Education, and
other resources. Please feel free to use and encourage your students to
use these materials.
*********
Please contact David Stoloff at (860) 465-5501, email: stoloffd@easternct.edu if you have any
questions or comments on this newsletter. Please invite others to
receive this newsletter and be added
to the Education Department e-mailing list by contacting David Stoloff.